qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 01/22] target/i386: Only realize existing APIC device


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] target/i386: Only realize existing APIC device
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:32:21 +0100

On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:02:34 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:

> APIC state is created under a certain condition,
> use the same condition to realize it.
> Having a NULL APIC state is a bug: use assert().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/i386/cpu-sysemu.c | 9 +++------
>  target/i386/cpu.c        | 8 +++++---
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu-sysemu.c b/target/i386/cpu-sysemu.c
> index 2375e48178..6a164d3769 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu-sysemu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu-sysemu.c
> @@ -272,9 +272,7 @@ void x86_cpu_apic_create(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>      APICCommonState *apic;
>      APICCommonClass *apic_class = apic_get_class(errp);
>  
> -    if (!apic_class) {
> -        return;
> -    }
> +    assert(apic_class);

if errp doesn't lead to error_fatal/abort, wouldn't that effectively mask
following error
 apic_get_class():
      error_setg(errp, "KVM does not support userspace APIC");
      return NULL;
???

>  
>      cpu->apic_state = 
> DEVICE(object_new_with_class(OBJECT_CLASS(apic_class)));
>      object_property_add_child(OBJECT(cpu), "lapic",
> @@ -293,9 +291,8 @@ void x86_cpu_apic_realize(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>      APICCommonState *apic;
>      static bool apic_mmio_map_once;
>  
> -    if (cpu->apic_state == NULL) {
> -        return;
> -    }
> +    assert(cpu->apic_state);

it would be better to explode in one place only inside apic_get_class(),
provided !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() case is dealt with properly.


>      qdev_realize(DEVICE(cpu->apic_state), NULL, errp);
>  
>      /* Map APIC MMIO area */
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index b2a20365e1..a23d4795e0 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -7448,9 +7448,11 @@ static void x86_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>      }
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> -    x86_cpu_apic_realize(cpu, &local_err);
> -    if (local_err != NULL) {
> -        goto out;
> +    if (cpu->env.features[FEAT_1_EDX] & CPUID_APIC || ms->smp.cpus > 1) {
> +        x86_cpu_apic_realize(cpu, &local_err);
> +        if (local_err != NULL) {
> +            goto out;
> +        }

better move 'if (cpu->apic_state == NULL) {' from x86_cpu_apic_realize()
to the caller, instead of repeating test again.

>      }
>  #endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
>      cpu_reset(cs);




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]