[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 03/21] hw/ppc/spapr_cpu: Use qdev_is_realized() instead of QOM AP
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
[PATCH 03/21] hw/ppc/spapr_cpu: Use qdev_is_realized() instead of QOM API |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:02:54 +0100 |
Prefer QDev API for QDev objects, avoid the underlying QOM layer.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
index 0c0fb3f1b0..40b7c52f7f 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
@@ -245,8 +245,7 @@ static void spapr_cpu_core_unrealize(DeviceState *dev)
* spapr_cpu_core_realize(), make sure we only unrealize
* vCPUs that have already been realized.
*/
- if (object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(sc->threads[i]), "realized",
- &error_abort)) {
+ if (qdev_is_realized(DEVICE(sc->threads[i]))) {
spapr_unrealize_vcpu(sc->threads[i], sc);
}
spapr_delete_vcpu(sc->threads[i]);
--
2.41.0
- [PATCH 00/21] hw: More QDev cleanups, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/02/16
- [PATCH 01/21] hw/i386/pc: Do not use C99 mixed-declarations style, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/02/16
- [PATCH 02/21] hw/i386/pc_sysfw: Use qdev_is_realized() instead of QOM API, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/02/16
- [PATCH 03/21] hw/ppc/spapr_cpu: Use qdev_is_realized() instead of QOM API,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=
- [PATCH 04/21] hw/tricore/testboard: Use qdev_new() instead of QOM basic API, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/02/16
- [PATCH 05/21] hw/ppc/pnv_bmc: Use qdev_new() instead of QOM API, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/02/16
- [PATCH 06/21] hw: Replace DEVICE(object_new) -> qdev_new(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/02/16
- [PATCH 07/21] target: Replace DEVICE(object_new) -> qdev_new(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/02/16
- [PATCH 09/21] hw/usb: Inline usb_try_new(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/02/16