qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 12/15] spapr: nested: Use correct source for parttbl info


From: Nicholas Piggin
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/15] spapr: nested: Use correct source for parttbl info for nested PAPR API.
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 20:16:22 +1000

On Tue Feb 20, 2024 at 6:36 PM AEST, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> For nested PAPR API, we use SpaprMachineStateNestedGuest struct to store
> partition table info, use the same in spapr_get_pate_nested() via
> helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
> Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h |  4 ++++
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c                |  2 ++
>  hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c         | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h
> index 1b7e55f12a..da918d2dd0 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h
> @@ -511,4 +511,8 @@ bool spapr_get_pate_nested_hv(SpaprMachineState *spapr, 
> PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>  void spapr_nested_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr);
>  uint8_t spapr_nested_api(SpaprMachineState *spapr);
>  void spapr_nested_gsb_init(void);
> +bool spapr_get_pate_nested_papr(SpaprMachineState *spapr, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                target_ulong lpid, ppc_v3_pate_t *entry);
> +SpaprMachineStateNestedGuest *spapr_get_nested_guest(SpaprMachineState 
> *spapr,
> +                                                     target_ulong lpid);
>  #endif /* HW_SPAPR_NESTED_H */
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 51a1be027a..3453b30a57 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1379,6 +1379,8 @@ static bool spapr_get_pate(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, 
> PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>          assert(spapr_nested_api(spapr));
>          if (spapr_nested_api(spapr) == NESTED_API_KVM_HV) {
>              return spapr_get_pate_nested_hv(spapr, cpu, lpid, entry);
> +        } else if (spapr_nested_api(spapr) == NESTED_API_PAPR) {
> +            return spapr_get_pate_nested_papr(spapr, cpu, lpid, entry);
>          }
>          return false;
>      }

BTW. I would change these asserts to } else { g_assert_not_reached(); }

> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
> index aba4b25da6..0edb362709 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,19 @@ bool spapr_get_pate_nested_hv(SpaprMachineState *spapr, 
> PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>      return true;
>  }
>  
> +bool spapr_get_pate_nested_papr(SpaprMachineState *spapr, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                target_ulong lpid, ppc_v3_pate_t *entry)
> +{
> +    SpaprMachineStateNestedGuest *guest;
> +    assert(lpid != 0);
> +    guest = spapr_get_nested_guest(spapr, lpid);
> +    assert(guest != NULL);
> +
> +    entry->dw0 = guest->parttbl[0];
> +    entry->dw1 = guest->parttbl[1];
> +    return true;
> +}

Asserts should not need to be changed to proper error handling, right?

Thanks,
Nick



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]