qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] spapr: nested: Introduce cap-nested-papr for Nested


From: Harsh Prateek Bora
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/14] spapr: nested: Introduce cap-nested-papr for Nested PAPR API
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:17:36 +0530
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Hi Nick,

On 3/12/24 17:41, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
Hi Nick,

On 3/12/24 17:21, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Fri Mar 8, 2024 at 9:19 PM AEST, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
Introduce a SPAPR capability cap-nested-papr which enables nested PAPR
API for nested guests. This new API is to enable support for KVM on PowerVM
and the support in Linux kernel has already merged upstream.

Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
---
  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |  6 +++-
  hw/ppc/spapr.c         |  2 ++
  hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c    | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c  |  8 ++++--
  4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
index 6223873641..4aaf23d28f 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
@@ -81,8 +81,10 @@ typedef enum {
  #define SPAPR_CAP_RPT_INVALIDATE        0x0B
  /* Support for AIL modes */
  #define SPAPR_CAP_AIL_MODE_3            0x0C
+/* Nested PAPR */
+#define SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_PAPR           0x0D
  /* Num Caps */
-#define SPAPR_CAP_NUM                   (SPAPR_CAP_AIL_MODE_3 + 1)
+#define SPAPR_CAP_NUM                   (SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_PAPR + 1)
  /*
   * Capability Values
@@ -592,6 +594,7 @@ struct SpaprMachineState {
  #define H_GUEST_CREATE_VCPU      0x474
  #define H_GUEST_GET_STATE        0x478
  #define H_GUEST_SET_STATE        0x47C
+#define H_GUEST_RUN_VCPU         0x480
  #define H_GUEST_DELETE           0x488
  #define MAX_HCALL_OPCODE         H_GUEST_DELETE
@@ -996,6 +999,7 @@ extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_cap_sbbc;
  extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_cap_ibs;
  extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_cap_hpt_maxpagesize;
  extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_cap_nested_kvm_hv;
+extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_cap_nested_papr;
  extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_cap_large_decr;
  extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_cap_ccf_assist;
  extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_cap_fwnmi;
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 54fc01e462..beb23fae8f 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -2121,6 +2121,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr = {
          &vmstate_spapr_cap_fwnmi,
          &vmstate_spapr_fwnmi,
          &vmstate_spapr_cap_rpt_invalidate,
+        &vmstate_spapr_cap_nested_papr,
          NULL
      }
  };
@@ -4687,6 +4688,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
      smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_IBS] = SPAPR_CAP_WORKAROUND;
      smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_HPT_MAXPAGESIZE] = 16; /* 64kiB */
      smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_KVM_HV] = SPAPR_CAP_OFF;
+    smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_PAPR] = SPAPR_CAP_OFF;
      smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_LARGE_DECREMENTER] = SPAPR_CAP_ON;
      smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_CCF_ASSIST] = SPAPR_CAP_ON;
      smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_FWNMI] = SPAPR_CAP_ON;
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
index e889244e52..d6d5a6b8df 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
@@ -487,6 +487,58 @@ static void cap_nested_kvm_hv_apply(SpaprMachineState *spapr,               error_append_hint(errp, "Try appending -machine cap-nested-hv=off "
                                      "or use threads=1 with -smp\n");
          }
+        if (spapr_nested_api(spapr) &&
+            spapr_nested_api(spapr) != NESTED_API_KVM_HV) {
+            error_setg(errp, "Nested-HV APIs are mutually exclusive/incompatible"); +            error_append_hint(errp, "Please use either cap-nested-hv or "
+                                    "cap-nested-papr to proceed.\n");
+            return;
+        } else {
+            spapr->nested.api = NESTED_API_KVM_HV;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+static void cap_nested_papr_apply(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
+                                    uint8_t val, Error **errp)
+{
+    ERRP_GUARD();
+    PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
+    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
+
+    if (!val) {
+        /* capability disabled by default */
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        if (!(env->insns_flags2 & PPC2_ISA300)) {
+            error_setg(errp, "Nested-PAPR only supported on POWER9 and later");
+            error_append_hint(errp,
+                              "Try appending -machine cap-nested-papr=off\n");
+            return;
+        }
+        if (spapr_nested_api(spapr) &&
+            spapr_nested_api(spapr) != NESTED_API_PAPR) {
+            error_setg(errp, "Nested-HV APIs are mutually exclusive/incompatible"); +            error_append_hint(errp, "Please use either cap-nested-hv or "
+                                    "cap-nested-papr to proceed.\n");
+            return;
+        } else {
+            spapr->nested.api = NESTED_API_PAPR;
+        }
+
+    } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
+        /*
+         * this gets executed in L1 qemu when L2 is launched,
+         * needs kvm-hv support in L1 kernel.
+         */
+        if (!kvmppc_has_cap_nested_kvm_hv()) {
+            error_setg(errp,
+                       "KVM implementation does not support Nested-HV");
+        } else if (kvmppc_set_cap_nested_kvm_hv(val) < 0) {
+            error_setg(errp, "Error enabling Nested-HV with KVM");
+        }

I'll just disable this on KVM for now. With that changed,

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>


AFAIK, v2 api also expects this capability to be enabled on L1 kernel.
I guess the reason is the L1 implementation has used the same capab and
extended to be used with v2 api. So, this check is needed in L1 Qemu for
now. We may revisit L1 implementation later to see if a change is
appropriate.

Please ignore above response. I think my observation was based on older version of L1 implementation. This doesnt seem to be an issue with upstream L1. You may disable the kvm_enabled() path for now. I just tested and it works fine.

regards,
Harsh


regards,
Harsh

      }
  }
@@ -735,6 +787,15 @@ SpaprCapabilityInfo capability_table[SPAPR_CAP_NUM] = {
          .type = "bool",
          .apply = cap_nested_kvm_hv_apply,
      },
+    [SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_PAPR] = {
+        .name = "nested-papr",
+        .description = "Allow Nested HV (PAPR API)",
+        .index = SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_PAPR,
+        .get = spapr_cap_get_bool,
+        .set = spapr_cap_set_bool,
+        .type = "bool",
+        .apply = cap_nested_papr_apply,
+    },
      [SPAPR_CAP_LARGE_DECREMENTER] = {
          .name = "large-decr",
          .description = "Allow Large Decrementer",
@@ -919,6 +980,7 @@ SPAPR_CAP_MIG_STATE(sbbc, SPAPR_CAP_SBBC);
  SPAPR_CAP_MIG_STATE(ibs, SPAPR_CAP_IBS);
  SPAPR_CAP_MIG_STATE(hpt_maxpagesize, SPAPR_CAP_HPT_MAXPAGESIZE);
  SPAPR_CAP_MIG_STATE(nested_kvm_hv, SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_KVM_HV);
+SPAPR_CAP_MIG_STATE(nested_papr, SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_PAPR);
  SPAPR_CAP_MIG_STATE(large_decr, SPAPR_CAP_LARGE_DECREMENTER);
  SPAPR_CAP_MIG_STATE(ccf_assist, SPAPR_CAP_CCF_ASSIST);
  SPAPR_CAP_MIG_STATE(fwnmi, SPAPR_CAP_FWNMI);
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
index 597dba7fdc..8db9dc19e3 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c
@@ -13,13 +13,15 @@
  void spapr_nested_reset(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
  {
      if (spapr_get_cap(spapr, SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_KVM_HV)) {
-        spapr->nested.api = NESTED_API_KVM_HV;
          spapr_unregister_nested_hv();
          spapr_register_nested_hv();
-    } else {
-        spapr->nested.api = 0;
+    } else if (spapr_get_cap(spapr, SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_PAPR)) {
          spapr->nested.capabilities_set = false;
+        spapr_unregister_nested_papr();
+        spapr_register_nested_papr();
          spapr_nested_gsb_init();
+    } else {
+        spapr->nested.api = 0;
      }
  }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]