qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4] hw/arm/virt: Don't create device-tree node for empty NUMA


From: Andrew Jones
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hw/arm/virt: Don't create device-tree node for empty NUMA node
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:22:26 +0200

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 06:49:09PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The empty NUMA node, where no memory resides, are allowed. For
> example, the following command line specifies two empty NUMA nodes.
> With this, QEMU fails to boot because of the conflicting device-tree
> node names, as the following error message indicates.
> 
>   /home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/build/qemu-system-aarch64 \
>   -accel kvm -machine virt,gic-version=host               \
>   -cpu host -smp 4,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=1            \
>   -m 1024M,slots=16,maxmem=64G                            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=512M            \
>   -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=mem0                \
>   -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,memdev=mem1                \
>   -numa node,nodeid=2                                     \
>   -numa node,nodeid=3
>     :
>   qemu-system-aarch64: FDT: Failed to create subnode /memory@80000000: 
> FDT_ERR_EXISTS
> 
> As specified by linux device-tree binding document, the device-tree
> nodes for these empty NUMA nodes shouldn't be generated. However,
> the corresponding NUMA node IDs should be included in the distance
> map. As the memory hotplug through device-tree on ARM64 isn't existing
> so far, it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes through device-tree.

Instead of "it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes through
device-tree", how about

 it's not necessary to require the user to provide a distance map.
 Furthermore, the default distance map Linux generates may even be
 sufficient.

> So this simply skips populating the device-tree nodes for these empty
> NUMA nodes to avoid the error, so that QEMU can be started successfully.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
> v4: Drop patch to enforce distance-map as memory hotplug through
>     device-tree is never supported on ARM64. It's pointless to
>     expose these empty NUMA nodes. Besides, comments added to
>     explain the code changes included in this patch as Drew
>     suggested.
> ---
>  hw/arm/boot.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
> index 57efb61ee4..e05c1c149c 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/boot.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
> @@ -599,10 +599,24 @@ int arm_load_dtb(hwaddr addr, const struct 
> arm_boot_info *binfo,
>      }
>      g_strfreev(node_path);
>  
> +    /*
> +     * According to Linux NUMA binding document, the device tree nodes
> +     * for the empty NUMA nodes shouldn't be generated, but their NUMA
> +     * node IDs should be included in the distance map instead. However,
> +     * it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes as memory hotplug
> +     * through device tree is never supported. We simply skip generating
> +     * their device tree nodes to avoid the unexpected device tree
> +     * generating failure due to the duplicated names of these empty
> +     * NUMA nodes.
> +     */

    /*
     * We drop all the memory nodes which correspond to empty NUMA nodes from
     * the device tree, because the Linux NUMA binding document states they
     * should not be generated.  Linux will get the NUMA node IDs of the empty
     * NUMA nodes from the distance map if they are needed.  This means QEMU
     * users may be obliged to provide command lines which configure distance
     * maps when the empty NUMA node IDs are needed and Linux's default
     * distance map isn't sufficient.
     */



>      if (ms->numa_state != NULL && ms->numa_state->num_nodes > 0) {
>          mem_base = binfo->loader_start;
>          for (i = 0; i < ms->numa_state->num_nodes; i++) {
>              mem_len = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
> +            if (!mem_len) {
> +                continue;
> +            }
> +
>              rc = fdt_add_memory_node(fdt, acells, mem_base,
>                                       scells, mem_len, i);
>              if (rc < 0) {
> -- 
> 2.23.0
>

Thanks,
drew 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]