Re: [PATCH v13 6/7] [RISCV_PM] Implement address masking functions required for RISC-V Pointer Masking extension

[Richard Henderson]

On 10/15/21 12:29 PM, Alexey Baturo wrote:
>   FIELD(TB_FLAGS, MSTATUS_HS_FS, 10, 2)
> +/* If PointerMasking should be applied */
> +FIELD(TB_FLAGS, PM_ENABLED, 10, 1)

Merge error.

> +    if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVJ)) {
> +        int priv = cpu_mmu_index(env, false) & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK;

cpu_mmu_index has already been computed.
You want

    int priv = flags & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK;

> @@ -118,16 +125,6 @@ static void gen_nanbox_s(TCGv_i64 out, TCGv_i64 in)
>      tcg_gen_ori_i64(out, in, MAKE_64BIT_MASK(32, 32));
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Temp stub: generates address adjustment for PointerMasking
> - */
> -static void gen_pm_adjust_address(DisasContext *s,
> -                                  TCGv         *dst,
> -                                  TCGv          src)
> -{
> -    tcg_gen_mov_tl(*dst, src);
> -}
> -

You might as well place the function correctly in the previous patch.
Drop the silly alignment of parameters.

> +    int priv = cpu_mmu_index(env, false) & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK;
> +    ctx->pm_mask = pm_mask[priv];

Using cpu_mmu_index within the translator is incorrect.  You want

    priv = tb_flags & TB_FLAGS_PRIV_MMU_MASK;


r~