qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 04/21] target/riscv: additional macros to check instructio


From: Frédéric Pétrot
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/21] target/riscv: additional macros to check instruction support
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 18:22:33 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0

Le 20/10/2021 à 16:08, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 10/19/21 2:47 AM, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
>> +
>> +#define REQUIRE_64_OR_128BIT(ctx) do { \
>> +    if (get_xl(ctx) == MXL_RV32) {     \
>> +        return false;                  \
>> +    }                                  \
>> +} while (0)
> 
> So... you've left REQUIRE_64BIT accepting RV128, so that means that your 
> current
> REQUIRE_64_OR_128BIT is redundant.  Is that intentional?
> 
> It does seem like all places that accept RV128 should accept RV64, but perhaps
> that's just your "limited" caveat in the cover letter.

  My bad, indeed there is no instruction only required by RV64. "Limited" was
  related to the minimal support of the priviledge spec.
> You don't use REQUIRE_32_OR_64BIT at all.  Remove it?

  It's a bug : some compressed insns are only RV32/RV64 (this is linked to
  the other bug in the order in which the insns stand in the insn16.decode
  file that you pointed out).

  Frédéric
> 
> 
> r~

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Frédéric Pétrot, Pr. Grenoble INP-Ensimag/TIMA,   Ensimag deputy director |
| Mob/Pho: +33 6 74 57 99 65/+33 4 76 57 48 70      Ad augusta  per angusta |
| http://tima.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]