qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] hw/riscv: virt: Add PMU DT node to the device tree


From: Atish Patra
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] hw/riscv: virt: Add PMU DT node to the device tree
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 17:23:09 -0800

On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 6:46 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/1/22 01:48, Atish Patra wrote:
> > Qemu virt machine can support few cache events and cycle/instret counters.
> > It also supports counter overflow for these events.
> >
> > Add a DT node so that OpenSBI/Linux kernel is aware of the virt machine
> > capabilities. There are some dummy nodes added for testing as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> >   hw/riscv/virt.c    | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   target/riscv/pmu.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   target/riscv/pmu.h |  1 +
> >   3 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
>
> > +static void create_fdt_socket_pmu(RISCVVirtState *s,
> > +                                  int socket, uint32_t *phandle,
> > +                                  uint32_t *intc_phandles)
> > +{
> > +    int cpu;
> > +    char *pmu_name;
> > +    uint32_t *pmu_cells;
> > +    MachineState *mc = MACHINE(s);
> > +    RISCVCPU hart = s->soc[socket].harts[0];
> > +
> > +    pmu_cells = g_new0(uint32_t, s->soc[socket].num_harts * 2);
> > +
> > +    for (cpu = 0; cpu < s->soc[socket].num_harts; cpu++) {
> > +        pmu_cells[cpu * 2 + 0] = cpu_to_be32(intc_phandles[cpu]);
> > +        pmu_cells[cpu * 2 + 1] = cpu_to_be32(IRQ_PMU_OVF);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    pmu_name = g_strdup_printf("/soc/pmu");
> > +    qemu_fdt_add_subnode(mc->fdt, pmu_name);
> > +    qemu_fdt_setprop_string(mc->fdt, pmu_name, "compatible", "riscv,pmu");
> > +    riscv_pmu_generate_fdt_node(mc->fdt, hart.cfg.pmu_num, pmu_name);
>
> pmu_cells[] is not consumed...
>

Oops. I removed the DT requirement in the kernel. Forgot to remove this snippet.
Thanks!

I will fix it in the next version.

> > +
> > +    g_free(pmu_name);
> > +    g_free(pmu_cells);
> > +}
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Atish



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]