qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: Add support to change default RISCV hart memory re


From: Vysakh P Pillai
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/riscv: Add support to change default RISCV hart memory region
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 07:27:06 -0800
User-agent: Zoho Mail

In the machine model that I am trying to create, there are two CPU clusters. The management cluster has full access to the system resources through a global address space while the application cluster has access to a subset of the resources through a cluster local address space. 

The current implementation always attaches the system memory to the clusters and there is no means to isolate access to peripherals. With this patch, I am able to create re-mapped aliases to the global address space and attach it as sub-regions to the application cluster container. 

This approach also provides a capability to dynamically attach and detach sub-regions at runtime. 




---- On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 05:09:53 -0800 bmeng.cn@gmail.com wrote ----

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 1:29 PM Vysakh P Pillai
<vysakhpillai@embeddedinn.xyz> wrote:
>
> Add support to optionally specify a memory region container
> to be used to override the default system memory used
> by the the RISCV harts when they are realized. Additional
> memory regions can be added as sub-regions of this container
> to dynamically control the memory regions and mappings visible
> from the hart.

Could you please specify what user case are you trying to address with
this patch?

>
> Signed-off-by: Vysakh P Pillai <vysakhpillai@embeddedinn.xyz>
> ---
> hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c | 5 +++++
> include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> index 613ea2aaa0..7a8dcab7e7 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static Property riscv_harts_props[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_STRING("cpu-type", RISCVHartArrayState, cpu_type),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("resetvec", RISCVHartArrayState, resetvec,
> DEFAULT_RSTVEC),
> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("cpu-memory", RISCVHartArrayState,
> + cpu_memory,NULL),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> @@ -49,6 +51,9 @@ static bool riscv_hart_realize(RISCVHartArrayState *s, int idx,
> qdev_prop_set_uint64(DEVICE(&s->harts[idx]), "resetvec", s->resetvec);
> s->harts[idx].env.mhartid = s->hartid_base + idx;
> qemu_register_reset(riscv_harts_cpu_reset, &s->harts[idx]);
> + if (s->cpu_memory) {
> + object_property_set_link(OBJECT(&s->harts[idx].parent_obj), "memory",OBJECT(s->cpu_memory), &error_abort);
> + }
> return qdev_realize(DEVICE(&s->harts[idx]), NULL, errp);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h b/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> index bbc21cdc9a..3e5dfeeaae 100644
> --- a/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> +++ b/include/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct RISCVHartArrayState {
> uint32_t hartid_base;
> char *cpu_type;
> uint64_t resetvec;
> + uint64_t cpu_memory;
> RISCVCPU *harts;
> };
>

Regards,
Bin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]