qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] riscv: Change type of valid_vm_1_10_[32|64] to bool


From: Andrew Jones
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] riscv: Change type of valid_vm_1_10_[32|64] to bool
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:48:26 +0100

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:03:21AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> This array is actually used as a boolean so swap its current char type
> to a boolean and at the same time, change the type of validate_vm to
> bool since it returns valid_vm_1_10_[32|64].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>

Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>

> ---
>  target/riscv/csr.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
> index 0db2c233e5..6b157806a5 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/csr.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
> @@ -1117,16 +1117,16 @@ static const target_ulong hip_writable_mask = 
> MIP_VSSIP;
>  static const target_ulong hvip_writable_mask = MIP_VSSIP | MIP_VSTIP | 
> MIP_VSEIP;
>  static const target_ulong vsip_writable_mask = MIP_VSSIP;
>  
> -static const char valid_vm_1_10_32[16] = {
> -    [VM_1_10_MBARE] = 1,
> -    [VM_1_10_SV32] = 1
> +static const bool valid_vm_1_10_32[16] = {
> +    [VM_1_10_MBARE] = true,
> +    [VM_1_10_SV32] = true
>  };
>  
> -static const char valid_vm_1_10_64[16] = {
> -    [VM_1_10_MBARE] = 1,
> -    [VM_1_10_SV39] = 1,
> -    [VM_1_10_SV48] = 1,
> -    [VM_1_10_SV57] = 1
> +static const bool valid_vm_1_10_64[16] = {
> +    [VM_1_10_MBARE] = true,
> +    [VM_1_10_SV39] = true,
> +    [VM_1_10_SV48] = true,
> +    [VM_1_10_SV57] = true
>  };
>  
>  /* Machine Information Registers */
> @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static RISCVException read_mstatus(CPURISCVState *env, 
> int csrno,
>      return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
>  }
>  
> -static int validate_vm(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong vm)
> +static bool validate_vm(CPURISCVState *env, target_ulong vm)
>  {
>      if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) {
>          return valid_vm_1_10_32[vm & 0xf];
> @@ -2648,7 +2648,8 @@ static RISCVException read_satp(CPURISCVState *env, int 
> csrno,
>  static RISCVException write_satp(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
>                                   target_ulong val)
>  {
> -    target_ulong vm, mask;
> +    target_ulong mask;
> +    bool vm;
>  
>      if (!riscv_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_MMU)) {
>          return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> -- 
> 2.37.2
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]