qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-8.0] target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper: Test the right bits in


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-8.0] target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper: Test the right bits in psw_key_valid()
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:31:53 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0

On 05.12.22 15:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
The PSW key mask is a 16 bit field, and the psw_key variable is
in the range from 0 to 15, so it does not make sense to use
"0x80 >> psw_key" for testing the bits here. We should use 0x8000
instead.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
  Found by code inspection (Linux likely does not use these PSW key masks
  yet, otherwise we might have noticed earlier)

  target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
index 9542fad59b..cb82cd1c1d 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static inline bool psw_key_valid(CPUS390XState *env, uint8_t 
psw_key)
if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
          /* PSW key has range 0..15, it is valid if the bit is 1 in the PKM */
-        return pkm & (0x80 >> psw_key);
+        return pkm & (0x8000 >> psw_key);
      }
      return true;
  }

I assume a Fixes tag might be applicable (I remember I added that once).

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]