qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] target/i386: do not consult nonexistent host leaves


From: Maxim Levitsky
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/i386: do not consult nonexistent host leaves
Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 14:18:03 +0300
User-agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32)

On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 21:26 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> When cache_info_passthrough is requested, QEMU passes the host values
> of the cache information CPUID leaves down to the guest.  However,
> it blindly assumes that the CPUID leaf exists on the host, and this
> cannot be guaranteed: for example, KVM has recently started to
> synthesize AMD leaves up to 0x80000021 in order to provide accurate
> CPU bug information to guests.
> 
> Querying a nonexistent host leaf fills the output arguments of
> host_cpuid with data that (albeit deterministic) is nonsensical
> as cache information, namely the data in the highest Intel CPUID
> leaf.  If said highest leaf is not ECX-dependent, this can even
> cause an infinite loop when kvm_arch_init_vcpu prepares the input
> to KVM_SET_CPUID2.  The infinite loop is only terminated by an
> abort() when the array gets full.
> 
> Reported-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  target/i386/cpu.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 99343be926..c5461f7c0b 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -5022,6 +5022,37 @@ uint64_t 
> x86_cpu_get_supported_feature_word(FeatureWord w,
>      return r;
>  }
>  
> +static void x86_cpu_get_cache_cpuid(uint32_t func, uint32_t index,
> +                                    uint32_t *eax, uint32_t *ebx,
> +                                    uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx)
> +{
> +    uint32_t level, unused;
> +
> +    /* Only return valid host leaves.  */
> +    switch (func) {
> +    case 2:
> +    case 4:
> +        host_cpuid(0, 0, &level, &unused, &unused, &unused);
> +        break;
> +    case 0x80000005:
> +    case 0x80000006:
> +    case 0x8000001d:
> +        host_cpuid(0x80000000, 0, &level, &unused, &unused, &unused);
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (func > level) {
> +        *eax = 0;
> +        *ebx = 0;
> +        *ecx = 0;
> +        *edx = 0;
> +    } else {
> +        host_cpuid(func, index, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Only for builtin_x86_defs models initialized with 
> x86_register_cpudef_types.
>   */
> @@ -5280,7 +5311,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, 
> uint32_t count,
>      case 2:
>          /* cache info: needed for Pentium Pro compatibility */
>          if (cpu->cache_info_passthrough) {
> -            host_cpuid(index, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> +            x86_cpu_get_cache_cpuid(index, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
>              break;
>          } else if (cpu->vendor_cpuid_only && IS_AMD_CPU(env)) {
>              *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
> @@ -5300,7 +5331,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, 
> uint32_t count,
>      case 4:
>          /* cache info: needed for Core compatibility */
>          if (cpu->cache_info_passthrough) {
> -            host_cpuid(index, count, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> +            x86_cpu_get_cache_cpuid(index, count, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
>              /* QEMU gives out its own APIC IDs, never pass down bits 31..26. 
>  */
>              *eax &= ~0xFC000000;
>              if ((*eax & 31) && cs->nr_cores > 1) {
> @@ -5702,7 +5733,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, 
> uint32_t count,
>      case 0x80000005:
>          /* cache info (L1 cache) */
>          if (cpu->cache_info_passthrough) {
> -            host_cpuid(index, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> +            x86_cpu_get_cache_cpuid(index, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
>              break;
>          }
>          *eax = (L1_DTLB_2M_ASSOC << 24) | (L1_DTLB_2M_ENTRIES << 16) |
> @@ -5715,7 +5746,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, 
> uint32_t count,
>      case 0x80000006:
>          /* cache info (L2 cache) */
>          if (cpu->cache_info_passthrough) {
> -            host_cpuid(index, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> +            x86_cpu_get_cache_cpuid(index, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
>              break;
>          }
>          *eax = (AMD_ENC_ASSOC(L2_DTLB_2M_ASSOC) << 28) |
> @@ -5775,7 +5806,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, 
> uint32_t count,
>      case 0x8000001D:
>          *eax = 0;
>          if (cpu->cache_info_passthrough) {
> -            host_cpuid(index, count, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> +            x86_cpu_get_cache_cpuid(index, count, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
>              break;
>          }
>          switch (count) {

Makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevisk@redhat.com>

Best regards,
        Maxim Levitsky




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]