[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] aliasing builtin commands
From: |
Jonathan Walther |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] aliasing builtin commands |
Date: |
Sat Mar 23 12:32:22 2002 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
So you are saying there should be an "alias stack" where an alias can
point to an alias can point to an alias? What if something you define
later, "foo", depends on the aliased meaning of "bar", then you unalias
bar? What happens to the definition of foo? It's just better not to
let keywords be overridden.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 11:48:50AM +0100, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 02:35:31AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
If you did something like that, how would you get access to the original
builtin commands again?
By using unalias first?
The reason for creating an alias for an existing command is problary to
extend it's functionality.
My opinion is that I think it should be possible.
--
Geek House Productions, Ltd.
Providing Unix & Internet Contracting and Consulting,
QA Testing, Technical Documentation, Systems Design & Implementation,
General Programming, E-commerce, Web & Mail Services since 1998
Phone: 604-435-1205
Email: address@hidden
Webpage: http://reactor-core.org
Address: 2459 E 41st Ave, Vancouver, BC V5R2W2
pgpCswwVutNJK.pgp
Description: PGP signature