repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Evals and press released published


From: Mike Gerwitz
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Evals and press released published
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:20:04 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux)

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 18:22:21 -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> "Important site functionality does not work without running nonfree
> JavaScript" for Sourceforge. That's not even clear or valid! As far as
> we know, it might be free JS! The only thing we know is that the
> functions don't work with LibreJS active, and that's the criteria, right?
>
> Why is this so hard?

Sorry, I somehow decided to copy the part you didn't like instead of the
part you suggested; let me try this without distraction.  I'm using your
original suggested text:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

*** eval-page-draft-old.html    2016-04-25 20:40:29.890602588 -0400
--- eval-page-draft.html        2016-04-25 22:18:12.226870715 -0400
***************
*** 143,150 ****
  
  <ul>
    <li id="GitHub-C0">
!     Important site functionality does not work without running nonfree
!     JavaScript.
      (<a href="repo-criteria.html#C0">C0</a>)
    </li>
  
--- 143,149 ----
  
  <ul>
    <li id="GitHub-C0">
!     Important site functionality does not work with LibreJS enabled.
      (<a href="repo-criteria.html#C0">C0</a>)
    </li>
  
***************
*** 166,173 ****
  
  <ul>
    <li id="SourceForge-C0">
!     Important site functionality doesn't work without JavaScript, or with
!     LibreJS enabled. (<a href="repo-criteria.html#C0">C0</a>)
    </li>
  
    <li id="SourceForge-C2">Rejects users from certain countries.</li>
--- 165,172 ----
  
  <ul>
    <li id="SourceForge-C0">
!     Important site functionality does not work with LibreJS enabled.
!     (<a href="repo-criteria.html#C0">C0</a>)
    </li>
  
    <li id="SourceForge-C2">Rejects users from certain countries.</li>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

GNU ethical repository criteria evaluations

We maintain this evaluation report presenting the compliance level of repository services with the GNU ethical repository criteria. There are some criteria that we can’t possibly verify, in which case we accept the site maintainer’s word on the matter. This evaluation is done by volunteers coordinated by the Free Software Foundation, and you are welcome to contribute.

Site Grade Date Criteria Version
GNU Savannah A 1.0
GitLab C 1.0
GitHub F 1.0
SourceForge F 1.0

GNU SavannahA

Savannah has already acheived the highest grade for ethical hosting; these are the issues that would need to be addressed for it to earn extra credit. If you would like to volunteer to help make some of these changes, please join the Savannah team.

GitLabC

Things that prevent it from moving up to the next grade, B:

GitHubF

Things that prevent it from moving up to the next grade, C:

SourceForgeF

Things that prevent it from moving up to the next grade, C:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature



-- 
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]