repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut


From: Yuchen Pei
Subject: Re: Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:13:04 +1000
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.2


Yuchen Pei <hi@ypei.me> writes:

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's
example. ]]]

  > it has ben evaluated
  > https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Sourcehut

Would someone like to turn this into a patch ready to install
in https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html?

There was a patch[1] from bill-auger. We later had a discussion on SaaSS (C5) and whether CI/CD count as SaaSS[2][3]. I would answer "not sure" to C5 for sr.ht. Otherwise that patch looks good to me.

I meant A5, not C5, sorry.


[1]:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00036.html (Mon, 14 Jun 2021 19:33:09 -0400)
[2]:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00060.html (Mon, 21 Jun 2021 23:13:51 +1000)
[3]:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00064.html (Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:19:46 -0400)


--
Best,
Yuchen

PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040  4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
          <https://ypei.me/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]