repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Please review codeberg.org


From: Yuchen Pei
Subject: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:44:04 +1100
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.2


bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community> writes:

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:53:42 +1000 Yuchen wrote:
I've updated the libreplanet checklist.

the checklist shows B0 and B2 failing - which passing? - should
codeberg get a 'C' for now; and possibly upgrade it later - or
is it the complete 'B' set now (checklist should be updated)?

Do you mean the reason for B0 and B2 failing are no longer true?

Below I copy the wiki descriptions at <https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Codeberg>:

☐       B0 - Compatible with LibreJS (or equivalent tool)
NOTES: some scripts are not labeled, uses the name "MIT" for expat license.

I don't see changes in this, at least some scripts at codeberg.org are still blocked by librejs.

☐       B2 - Does not encourage unclear licensing
NOTES: no diff between GPLv3 and GPLv3-or-later repositories https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00022.html

--
Best,
Yuchen

PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040  4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
          <https://ypei.me/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]