Hi,
You are likely subscribed to the Savannah-hackers-public mailing list.
If you wish to unsubscribe, you may do so here:
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers-public
--
Michael J. Flickinger
On 12/20/2010 06:23 PM, Ozcan Tercan via RT wrote:
REPLIES GO TO REQUESTORS BY DEFAULT.
<URL: http://rt.gnu.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=649274 >
Hey Guys,
Can some one take me off this mailing list. Would really appreciate it.
Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Bernie Innocenti via RT
<address@hidden>wrote:
REPLIES GO TO REQUESTORS BY DEFAULT.
<URL: http://rt.gnu.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=649274 >
[peabo - Mon Dec 20 13:21:11 2010]:
So it appears that if we accept 4 hours of downtime (no VMs running)
we can add one disk to the RAID.
Adding two disks would take longer, but probably not a lot longer.
Trying to add disks without an
explanation of why the overloads take place seems to be risky.
Ok, we replaced the two suspect drives with two new ones.
We did not add them to the arrays yet.
--
Bernie Innocenti
Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation
Hey Guys,
Can some one take me off this mailing list. Would really
appreciate it. Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Bernie
Innocenti via RT <address@hidden> wrote:
REPLIES GO TO REQUESTORS BY DEFAULT.
<URL: http://rt.gnu.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=649274
>
> [peabo - Mon Dec 20 13:21:11 2010]:
> So it appears that if we accept 4 hours of downtime (no VMs
running)
> we can add one disk to the RAID.
> Adding two disks would take longer, but probably not a lot longer.
> Trying to add disks without an
> explanation of why the overloads take place seems to be risky.
Ok, we replaced the two suspect drives with two new ones.
We did not add them to the arrays yet.
--
Bernie Innocenti
Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation
|