[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Submission got lost?
From: |
Hugo Gayosso |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Submission got lost? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:59:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> A week ago I got a list of pending evaluations and MIT Scheme was not
> on it. Which means that Chris's request got lost at some point.
The process (as we agreed to, some time ago) is that savannah-hackers
send the request to address@hidden, then once they talk with the
author and he/she agrees in following the GNU standards and so on,
they forward it to us.
> Can people please check and see where and how it got lost?
I have included address@hidden in this message, I guess the
request is there as I saw (in the savannah-hackers mailing list) that
Jaime said MIT Scheme was submitted for evaluation and as shown in the
email attached in your message.
> Please report back to me on what happened, and please propose
> changed procedures so that such requests won't get lost in the
> future.
We have received some requests directly to gnueval (either from
savannah-hackers or from the authors themselves) in the past, but
bkuhn said to do: savannah-hackers -> maintainers -> gnueval.
I will add MIT Scheme to the pending list now.
Greetings,
- --
Hugo Gayosso
GNU Software Evaluators coordinator
http://www.gnu.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+BPJcMNObVRBZveYRAuBaAJ0cEGd9V7sJ5Zy6D7e7wQmeI2xolQCfWrab
VSjfKzPcupWAYkpLiFTH3GE=
=iXFq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Submission got lost?,
Hugo Gayosso <=
[Savannah-hackers] Re: Submission got lost?, Hugo Gayosso, 2002/12/21