savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of The Quantum Coreworld - savannah.no


From: Sylvain Beucler
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of The Quantum Coreworld - savannah.nongnu.org
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:17:31 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

Hi,

We did not get a response from you, so we deleted your project from
the pending queue.

If you would still like to have your project hosted at Savannah,
please register it again.

The re-registration URL found in our acknowledgment of your earlier
registration will direct you to the proper location where you can
re-register your project.

Regards,

-- 
Sylvain

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 04:27:22PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Is there a new version with fixes now?
> 
> -- 
> Sylvain
> 
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:45:08AM -0400, Alexander (Sasha) Wait wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 18:02, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > > Can you add explicit copyright and license notices to these documents?
> > > If verbosity is an issue, check
> > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto.html for a smaller notice that
> > > refers to the main document (if you have one).
> > > 
> > OK 
> > 
> > > Moreover, you cannot include coreworld-standard.txt at Savannah until
> > > you are sure that you can distribute it under the GNU GPL.
> > > 
> > I will contact the copyright holders (if I can).  The original
> > "standard" was posted to Usenet without a copyright notice.  One might
> > think it is in the public domain but I am not a lawyer.    
> > 
> > > I see a small non-standard GDFL notice:
> > > "with the Invariant Sections being just Philosophy and Acknowledgements"
> > > 
> > > The word 'just' should not be included; the GFDL permits to add
> > > Invariant section in future releases, and it could be misinterpreted.
> > > 
> > > Also, you do not need to explicitely cite Acknowledgements, as it is
> > > already covered by section 4.K of the GNU FDL.
> > > 
> > > Each part of the document should carry a small copyright+license
> > > notice as described in http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto.html
> > > 
> > OK
> > 
> > > Last, you need to include a full copy of the GNU FDL along with your
> > > document.  The GPL FAQ explains why these procedures must be followed.
> > > For example, to learn why a copy of the GPL must be included with
> > > every copy of the code, for example, go to
> > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhyMustIInclude
> > > 
> > > Don't feel sorry for adding that document, it is my job to point to
> > > good licensing practices ;)
> > > 
> > Thanks for all the information! 
> > 
> > > Elfyn is working on Arch, and we already began discussing the problem
> > > Arch brings (namely, the fact that the repository is accessible by
> > > SFTP, with less repository protection than with CVS).
> > > 
> > > I won't hide you that we have other issues with higher priority at the
> > > moment, but be sure we are interested in supporting Arch :)
> > 
> > It's good to hear you may support Arch in the future.  I'm writing a
> > document about "Managing the Quantum Coreworld Project with GNU Arch". I
> > hope it will be generic enough to be useful to others. Early draft at: 
> > 
> >       * 
> > http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/Managing_20the_20Quantum_20Coreworld_20Project_20with_20GNU_20Arch




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]