[Savannah-register-public] [task #3738] Submission of Open Incident Command System Architectur

[Sylvain Beucler]

Follow-up Comment #3, task #3738 (project administration):

Hi,



The error you got was because you posted to a bounce address. The system use
this bounce address because you should use the tracker
(https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=3738) instead - what
you got is only a notification.



I can wait until monday to get the final name of the project :)





On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 02:16:05PM -0600, Jdunfee wrote:

> Trying this again - my apologies if this is the second time you get this.

>

> Hello,

>

> My apologies for not getting back to you sooner; I was on a short

> vacation with my wife, and my previous reply was bounced because of

> authentication problem:

>

> ... while talking to mx10.gnu.org.:

> >>> DATA

> <<< 451 Could not complete sender verify callout

> <address@hidden>... Deferred: 451 Could not complete sender
verify

> callout

> <<< 503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA

> ... while talking to mx20.gnu.org.:

> >>> DATA

> <<< 451 Could not complete sender verify callout

> <address@hidden>... Deferred: 451 Could not complete sender
verify

> callout

> <<< 503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA

>

> I haven't had a chance to figure this out yet, so I'm sending this from

> my ISP's web interface (which times out on me if I'm not quick).

>

> Getting back to the project request:

>

> The switch from "open" to "free" is fine. I wasn't really thinking of

> "open" in the software sense as in the traditional architecture sense

> (open vs. closed). The software for this is really just a demo for the

> architecture ideas. Since we are concerned with the software here, I

> should also probably drop the "architecture" part.

>

> That said, I need to ponder the change for a day or two -- "Free

> Incident Command System" (FICS) may get mixed up with the "Free

> Internet Chess Server". Let me mention this to a couple friends who

> are helping and get their feedback. << UPDATE: I'm still waiting

> to hear back on this. Can I have till next Monday to give you a

> final name? We want to make sure that there are no name collisions

> with whatever we come up with.>>

>

> Also, my apologies for the "Linux" reference as opposed to

> "GNU/Linux". I can understand the sensitivity on the issue. I was

> using "GNU/SunOS" long before I ever heard of Linux. I'm just getting

> a little lazy.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Jon Dunfee



    _______________________________________________________

This item URL is:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=3738>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/