|
From: | Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro |
Subject: | [Savannah-register-public] [task #9908] Submission of ClipGrab |
Date: | Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:19:27 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; es-AR; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009102814 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3) |
Follow-up Comment #6, task #9908 (project administration): -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 November 11th 2009 in GNU Savannah item 9908: "Submission of ClipGrab" Do you mean require modified versions to delete the logo? I think than a program can be considered free even if you require than the logos are changed or removed for modified versions since the logo is not an functional part but is like a signature, is not unehtical if only you can use your signature. Anyway that requirement makes distribucion of modificated version very annoying. - From my viewpoint, require modified versions to remove logos it is a technical problem rather than a ethical one. Any other restriction about the logo will be unethical too. To enable everybody modify and redistribute modified versions of you program easily licence logos so they arecompatible with GPL. I have dobut if GPL can be use with images since there is no clear point between source code and object code in this case. Wath administrators think? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkr6nWwACgkQZ4DA0TLic4hqPgCfZiywv7DQ0seyUwCoSUeYmq9l Cr8AnRKmFFJf2OwSww68LPZcPLDdRdxr =kpUY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9908> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |