Re: [task #15934] Submission of Drive Badger

[Tomasz Klim]

Hi

I checked these links and I believe that proper answers are:

1. GPL-2.0-or-later
2. Standard GNU/Linux userland binaries

Are there any remaining problems to solve?



W dniu 27.05.2021 o 14:50, Ineiev pisze:
> Follow-up Comment #3, task #15934 (project administration):
>
> [comment #2 comment #2:]
> > [comment #1 comment #1:]
> > > and didn't list all your dependencies.  Please do.
> > There are 2 types of dependencies:
> >
> > 1. External binaries:
> >
> > - https://github.com/Aorimn/dislocker (GPL2; executed only as separate
> binary, and its functionality is optional, to handle Bitlocker-encrypted NTFS
> filesystems)
> ...
>
> Please don't say "Licensed under the GPL2",
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html
>
> > - standard Linux userland binaries (cat, mv, mount etc.)
> This wording doesn't comply with our hosting requirements.  Savannah is the
> forge of the GNU Project, and we require that people give us due credit
> <https://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html> when hosting their packages
> here.
>
> > > Will the licensing of the result be compatible with Savannah hosting
> requirements? (By the way, do you understand well what they are?)
> > "To be hosted on Savannah, your project must be free software, and it must
> be kept independent of any nonfree software. (...)"
> > Yes, it will be compatible.
> This is more about dependencies rather than licensing; Savannah has more
> strict licensing requirements, e.g. the package must be GPL-compatible.
>
> I think I should ask you read our hosting requirements again, carefully.
>
>      _______________________________________________________
>
> Reply to this item at:
>
>    <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?15934>
>
> _______________________________________________
>    Message sent via Savannah
>    https://savannah.nongnu.org/

--
Tomasz Klim