speechd-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 2/2] rename spd_conv functions to spd_*


From: William Hubbs
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] rename spd_conv functions to spd_*
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:20:36 -0500

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 12:59:32AM +0200, Andrei Kholodnyi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Andrei Kholodnyi
> <andrei.kholodnyi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Trevor Saunders
> > <trev.saunders at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:27:58PM +0200, Andrei Kholodnyi wrote:
> >>> functions renamed according to the filename
> >>
> >> hmm, I'm not sure I see any purpose in this. ?Also I don't think there's
> >> any reason for the functions to have an spd_ prefix since we don't
> >> expose them outside of the project.
> >>
> >> Trev
> >
> > Hi Trev,
> >
> > back to my favorite topic - coding conventions, lol.
> > I need to dig out my proposal.
> >
> > well, since these functions are used across the whole project and
> > included in libcommon
> > it make sense to name all of them starting with spd_ prefix.
> 
> 
> >> we don't expose them outside of the project.
> actually we expose them since they are used in modules.

They are used in our modules, yes, but I think he means that they are
not public, in the sense that if someone writes an independent module
that is not part of our source tree they can't use them.  I would agree
that these are internal functions.

I will look at the patches though and see what I think.

William

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.freebsoft.org/pipermail/speechd/attachments/20101001/77d30117/attachment.pgp>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]