Re: [STUMP] Frames

[Shawn Betts]

Manuel Giraud <address@hidden> writes:

> The following patch is not a great thing. I've just changed the frame
> struct to be class. Updated the code where it needed to (not much, with a
> good naming convention :-). And add few after method though when the frame
> geometry is programmatically modified windows are update correctly.
>
> So now, you're in a SLIME repl connected to your stumpwm lisp process
> and you can go like this:
>
> (in-package :stumpwm)
> (with-accessors ((x frame-x) (y frame-y) (w frame-width) (h frame-height))
>                 (screen-current-frame (current-screen))
>               (setf x 200
>                   y 200
>                   w 800 
>                   h 600))
>
> Fun, isn't it :-)

That's kind of interesting actually. I originally saw no point to
using clos but perhaps a dash here and there could be useful. I think
I'll hold off applying this patch for now but I'll keep it in mind.

-Shawn