[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] Self-hosting? Dependency?
|
From: |
Trent W. Buck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] Self-hosting? Dependency? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 25 May 2008 10:38:31 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:32:14PM -0500, A.W. wrote:
> This might seem like a silly question, and I'm not going to remove
> SBCL, as, well, I want to use it.
> However, since SBCL itself is more-or-less compiled INTO StumpWM, do
> you need sbcl on your system still after StumpWM's compiled and
> installed?
>
> I just really like the idea of a self-hosting window manager.
That's no more "self hosting" than a statically linked ELF binary.