[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] Release engineering
From: |
Julian Stecklina |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] Release engineering |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:32:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Lionel Flandrin <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 02:03:35PM +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote:
[...]
>> On a related matter: What about an 1.0 release in the mid-term future?
>> What would be _your_ wishlist for StumpWM 1.0?
>
> For one: finish the "float" groups. It's really in alpha state right
> now. I don't use them myself but it's already halfway there and it's a
> good proof of concept for the new group "abstraction" layer which
> would make it possible to use different management modes for each
> group.
True. Float groups are useful at times. Personally, I think most of the
time using float groups can be avoided by nice placement rules, but then
I am too lazy to generate placement rules...
> An other feature often asked for on IRC is the ability to have
> independent groups per head and not only per screen.
I have had the very same discussion with Shawn on IRC, too. My personal
problem with the current model is that one cannot create a frame that
spans across two outputs. If I remember correctly, the result of the
discussion was that multihead support is a hard problem for a tiling
window manager and if someone wants to fundamentally change the way it
works, he should hack it himself. ;)
Regards
--
Julian Stecklina
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day
they start making vacuum cleaners - Ernst Jan Plugge
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, (continued)
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Shawn Betts, 2009/09/25
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Carlos Konstanski, 2009/09/25
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Julian Stecklina, 2009/09/28
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Ben Spencer, 2009/09/28
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Michael Raskin, 2009/09/28
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Shawn Betts, 2009/09/28
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Michael Raskin, 2009/09/28
- [STUMP] Release engineering (was: Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits), Julian Stecklina, 2009/09/29
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering (was: Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits), Lionel Flandrin, 2009/09/29
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering (was: Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits), Raffael Mancini, 2009/09/29
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering,
Julian Stecklina <=
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering, Michael Raskin, 2009/09/29
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering, Magnus Henoch, 2009/09/29
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering, Michael Raskin, 2009/09/29
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering, Julian Stecklina, 2009/09/29
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering, Vitaly Mayatskikh, 2009/09/29
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering (was: Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits), Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs, 2009/09/30
- Re: [STUMP] Release engineering, Julian Stecklina, 2009/09/30
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Ben Spencer, 2009/09/27
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Shawn Betts, 2009/09/27
- Re: [STUMP] Patch: improvement for scripting frame splits, Michael Raskin, 2009/09/27