Re: [STUMP] any objections to a version bump?

[David Vazquez]

Shawn Betts <address@hidden> writes:

> I've finally put it in the repo! I made a small change that will break
> backward compatibility, but in the long run it's for the best. I
> changed the optional arguments in completing-read and read-one-line to
> take keyword arguments.
>
> when the [no match] text pops up it's sort of ugly because it extends
> the size of the window then shrinks it. What would be a good way to
> make that prettier?

Thanks. The space for [no match] could be always reserved in bucket,
though it is not very better.