|
From: | Nima Talebi |
Subject: | Re: [swarm-hackers] GNU sed |
Date: | Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:20:22 +1100 |
Maybe it would be better, instead of trying to work around libtool and AC_PROG_SED, which could easily break in the future. Just have a completely separate macro that searches for GNU sed, then in the few cases in the source code where we specifically need GNU sed, then we uses a different variable like GSED to access it instead of plain sed.
My guess is that the normal sed should work fine for all the autoconf stuff, that is what AC_PROG_SED should be checking. We just need GNU sed for the template processing?
Scott
On Nov 23, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Bill Northcott wrote:
It will take a little longer to hack it up I'm afraid.
Libtool runs AC_PROG_SED and you need to stop LT_AC_PROG_SED using the cached value.
I will try to get it fixed up today.
Bill
_______________________________________________
swarm-hackers mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swarm-hackers
_______________________________________________
swarm-hackers mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/swarm-hackers
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |