|
From: | jean-michel.voicechat_fan |
Subject: | Re: [Swftools-common] small improvment required |
Date: | Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:24:53 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090812) |
and change the output name but the modification asked was so tiny ...if you have to extract several jpg for example now swfextract -j 1 dummy.swf -o pic1.jpg
swfextract -j 2 dummy.swf -o pic2.jpg swfextract -j 3 dummy.swf -o pic3.jpg instead of swfextract -j 1 dummy.swf swfextract -j 2 dummy.swf swfextract -j 3 dummy.swf it does not matter in fact Matthias Kramm a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:41:28AM +0100, jean-michel.voicechat_fan <address@hidden> wrote:i suggested you a very small & simple change which can be usefull in swfextract.cline 9 in function handlejpeg replace filename ="output.jpg" ; by filename =name ;That'll only cause a difference if you only specified a single object (image) to extract, and then you can specify an output filename using -o anyway.So I'm not sure what the benefit of that change would be. Could you describe more explicitly what you're trying to accomplish?Matthias
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |