[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality
From: |
Ricardo Pedroso |
Subject: |
Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality |
Date: |
Tue, 11 May 2010 01:23:14 +0100 |
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Ian Scott <address@hidden> wrote:
> I knew it wasn't pdf2swf's fault given the web agency's track record.
> I'm wondering what they could have screwed up while integrating and setting
> up pdf2swf within the application so that I can have a more efficient
> conversation with them.
> It must be something pretty serious in order to blow up the file size by a
> factor 10 while reducing image quality.
Just a hint, but you could check:
if the swfs that the web app produce are compressed.
You can analyse the swf's with swfdump and swfextract.
Probably you can find where are the diferences.
Also, if you can post some swf examples for both cases it will be easier
for someone assist you.
Ricardo
- [Swftools-common] "no way to define 64 bit integer", Chris de Kok, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] "no way to define 64 bit integer", Matthias Kramm, 2010/05/10
- [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality, Ian Scott, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality, Denis Zgonjanin, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality, Mark Lee, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality, Ian Scott, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality, Ian Scott, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality, Mark Lee, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality, Ian Scott, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] SWF file size and quality,
Ricardo Pedroso <=
Re: [Swftools-common] "no way to define 64 bit integer", Chris de Kok, 2010/05/11