[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL
From: |
Mohamed El Morabity |
Subject: |
Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:13:30 +0100 |
2011/1/6 Chris <address@hidden>:
>>On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:16:57 +0100
>>Mohamed El Morabity <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> >> I can do so, sure. However, since you're probably packaging swftools
>> >> as binaries (?), do you actually need this, given you're not actually
>> >> doing the linking against pdflib?
>> >>
>> >> Matthias
>> >>
>> >>
>>> I tried to package swftools with the most features enabled
>>> possible, so I'm linking against pdflib.
>> >
>> Any action about this issue?
>
> pmji here but...
>
> Why must you specifically link against pdflib?
>
>
> Chris
>
Well... pdflib is an optionnal dependency of swftools, required to
build the pdf2pdf binary. And as I said above, I'd like to enable as
many features as possible in my builds.
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Mohamed El Morabity, 2011/01/06
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Chris, 2011/01/06
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL,
Mohamed El Morabity <=
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Chris, 2011/01/06
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Mohamed El Morabity, 2011/01/06
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Chris, 2011/01/06
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Mohamed El Morabity, 2011/01/07
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Chris, 2011/01/08
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Mohamed El Morabity, 2011/01/10
- Re: [Swftools-common] Licensing issue with GPL, Chris, 2011/01/10