[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:33:59 +0200 (MET DST) |
> This seems indeed a well accepted usage.
> See for example qdir.h in the Qt header.
>
> enum FilterSpec { Dirs = 0x001,
> Files = 0x002,
> Drives = 0x004,
> NoSymLinks = 0x008,
> All = 0x007,
> TypeMask = 0x00F,
>
> ...
> };
The point is not that much about what is permitted or not,
but whether such a thing should be considered to be a *data type*.
I understand your point of avoiding to use the preprocessor,
but is this really *that* important in this case?
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch,
Joris van der Hoeven <=
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/14
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/14
Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/12