Re: [Texmacs-dev] set-before! and set-after! or cons! and rcons!

[Joris van der Hoeven]

> > 1049: Discuss
> >   Why not use the names cons! and rcons! ?
> 
> I find set-before! and set-after! to be more explicit.
> 
> But if you prefer cons! and rcons! (any prior art?) I will not argue.

I tried to search "cons!" on the web, but the ! is stripped automatically...
In any case, I guess that cons! should return the same result as cons.
Otherwise, we might have to use the names set-cons! and set-rcons!.