Re: [Texmacs-dev] {under,over}brace work

[Joris van der Hoeven]

On 17 Apr 2003, Nix N. Nix wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 11:56, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
>
> > I guess that it should not actually be in the rubber-cmex.enc,
> > but rather in the cmex.scm.enc (if that one exists).
>
> Yes, I've done that - well, I called it cmex.enc, and then I referenced
> it from math.enc .  It still kills TeXmacs with
>
> Fatal error: Font not found in 'math_font_rep::search_font'
>
> but I /have/ seen the "Please wait ..." popup for cmex.

You should take a look at progs/fonts/math-fonts.scm too.

> > Notice also that the "pointer" of the brace is not necessarily
> > in the middle; we probably need characters <overbrace-n-m>
> > and <underbrace-m-n>, where m and n are potentially different.
>
> Wow ! It isn't ?  Can you please show me some LaTeX-generated PDF to
> that effect ?  Not that I don't believe you, I'm just curious to see
> that - I've never seen an uneven over/underbrace before - not in LaTex,
> anyway.

I have seen that once in a book about TeX or LaTeX,
but I don't remember which one. Please try \overbrace
with an optional argument (percentage, length?).