|
From: | Andrey G. Grozin |
Subject: | Re: [Texmacs-dev] tmweb/download/linux.en.html#debian: TeXmacs in Debian unstable too old? |
Date: | Wed, 7 Mar 2007 00:44:33 +0600 (NOVT) |
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
It is an unfortunate historical accident that some documentation somewhere states that versions 1.0.x are "stable" and versions 1.0.x.y are "development". In reality, things don't work like this, and never did. There is no "stable" branch, in which only bug fixes are applied (and such a branch never existed). Instead, bugs in 1.0.x.y are fixed in 1.0.x.(y+1), together with adding new features. The development process is more like the kernel 2.6 process than the old even/odd stable/unstable one. So, versions 1.0.x.y are full-featured *releases*, not development snapshots. In fact, when a user encounters a bug in 1.0.6, the best adviuce to him/her is to upgrade to the latest 1.0.6.y and see if it has been fixed already. Nobody will ever fix a bug in 1.0.6. If the bug has not been fixed in the current 1.0.6.y, it will be, in 1.0.6.(y+1), not in 1.0.6.http://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/download/linux.en.html#debian says: Versions in "stable", "testing", and "unstable" are way too old. But Debian testing/unstable contains the very latest TeXmacs stable release, that is 1.0.6. What do you wish were in Debian releases? TeXmacs development snapshots?
Just IMHO, Andrey
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |