[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] problems with ecti10.pfb
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] problems with ecti10.pfb |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:49:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:36:18PM +0200, Gubinelli Massimiliano wrote:
> Hi Joris,
>
> On 24 sept. 09, at 22:34, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
>
> >Hi Max,
> >
> >No, everything works fine on my postscript laser printer...
> >
>
> Indeed it is strange since (at least before summer) I didn't have this
> problem. And the problem is present only when I print the files
> (unfortunately I do not have other printer for testing). To remove it
> I actually replaced the problematic fonts in TeXmacs/fonts/type1/ec/
> (essentially ecbi10.pfb, ecbx12.pfb and ecti10.pfb by equivalent
> version obtained by reencoding some of the Latin Modern fonts. This
> make me think about the fact that this replacement can be pushed into
> the standard distribution since the Latin Modern version of CM have
> more compact representation than the default TeXmacs ec*.pfb fonts
> (which as far as I understand are obtained by tracing the MetaFont
> generated CM font bitmaps). Do you think this is possible in full
> generality? Latin Modern contains a lot of gliphs and my replacements
> seems to work fine.
Yes, we can consider this kind of replacement ...
when we come to the reorganization of fonts.
Let us first complete the Qt port ;^)
Best wishes, --Joris