[Tinycc-devel] Re: Tinycc-devel Digest, Vol 19, Issue 10

[BUDI ARIEF GUSANDI]

...Why would someone want to work in a dos environment on purpose anyway?

Consider for embedded, the fastest of the compilation of the code, the
fastest we would finish our work for creating program that will got burn
into embedded flash. It's not the only one factor, but at least help
developer to cut the time for waiting in the compilation process.
Anyway by the way busway ;) can you tell me how to port TCC using
wdosx as you mention...please your help would be appreciated much ;)

Regards,
Budi


> Send Tinycc-devel mailing list submissions to
>         address@hidden

> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         address@hidden

> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         address@hidden

> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Tinycc-devel digest..."


> Today's Topics:

>    1. Re: Re: Tinycc-devel Digest, Vol 19, Issue 8 (Merlin R. Avery Jr.)


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:50:24 -0500
> From: "Merlin R. Avery Jr." <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: Tinycc-devel Digest, Vol 19, Issue 8
> To: <address@hidden>
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>         reply-type=original

>>> Do wee need to use protected mode to port tcc to DOS, so that we
>>> should add DOS32 extender ? Anyway i never use it before.
>>
>> Do you want to rewrite TCC so that it can handle memory managment in a
>> 16-bit segmented memory model?
>>
>>
>>

> That one made me LOL. Back in my dos days I found wdosx to be the best
> 32-bit extender. It was also a nice replacement for dos4gw from watcom. I
> recommend using that if someone is planning to do 32 bit dos. Then again,
> djgpp might be much easier to port to since it's gcc with a dos world around
> it. And has cwsdpmi as it's extender. Why would someone want to work in a
> dos environment on purpose anyway? 





> ------------------------------

> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel


> End of Tinycc-devel Digest, Vol 19, Issue 10
> ********************************************

> __________ NOD32 1.900 (20041020) Information __________

> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.nod32.com




-- 
Best regards,
 BUDI                            mailto:address@hidden