[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?
From: |
Greg Haerr |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:44:55 -0600 |
: For one thing, sizeof(void*) is much larger
: than sizeof(int) on the most common 64-bit architectures.
Interesting discussion. What's sizeof(void*) on these
common 64-bit architectures?
Out of curiousity, what is
sizeof(unsigned short)
sizeof(unsigned long)
sizeof(unsigned long long)
on these architectures?
Regards,
Greg
- [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, charlesrandall4-tinycc, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Dave Dodge, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Dave Dodge, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?,
Greg Haerr <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Henrik Nordstrom, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Alexander Strasser, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Alexander Strasser, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Alexander Strasser, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Dave Dodge, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Alexander Strasser, 2005/07/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Dave Dodge, 2005/07/12