[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Today's bug...
From: |
Rob Landley |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Today's bug... |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Sep 2007 06:33:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 |
On Thursday 06 September 2007 5:59:15 am Joshua Phillips wrote:
> Why can't we set __GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG, since we do indeed have
> support for long longs?
Because I don't want to hardwire a macro with the string "GLIBC" into tcc?
(I've used it against uClibc before, it doesn't depend on a specific C
library...)
It seems that the right thing to do is set __STDC_VERSION__ to show we have
c99, which I did, although now includes of regex.h are barfing. This might
be a glibc bug, or might be that we need to understand "restrict", I'll play
with it in the morning...
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.