[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++
From: |
Rick C. Hodgin |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++ |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:08:46 -0500 |
Basile,
Do you have any thoughts about implementing a minimalistic C++ extension
to TinyCC, specifically that includes only the class, public/ protected/
private, inheritance, member functions (virtual or no), and that's
basically it?
The idea would be the encapsulation of the base C++ design, but without
all the bloat, the ability to create a quick application that would
compile under any C++ compiler, but using only these features.
Any thoughts? And I realize you may be busy right now. Please respond
when you can. Thanks!
- Rick C. Hodgin
- [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Basile Starynkevitch, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Basile Starynkevitch, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Alain Greppin, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Basile Starynkevitch, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/19
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++,
Rick C. Hodgin <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Basile Starynkevitch, 2010/10/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] TinyC++, Rick C. Hodgin, 2010/10/29