|
From: | eligis |
Subject: | Re: [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: RE : [RFC] Moving source code to "src" |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:45:40 -0400 |
I would say much more. At least one or two weeks especially if during summer
Ouch!You're fast, maybe too fast.I've no responsibility on tcc project. If I think moving code to src is a good idea, it is my personal opinion. Official maintainers may have a different opinion or want to choose different code organization.Anyway, here is what I can already say (from my RPi)- it compiles well if you run make from src directory. I prefer a toplevel Makefile having different tagets calling make on different subdirectories.- related to previous point, you can't run 'make test' which fails
- have you modified build-tcc.bat for Windows ?C.----- message d'origine -----
De : "gus knight" <address@hidden>
date lun. 27/07/2015 22:11 (GMT +02:00)
À : "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
Objet : Re: [Tinycc-devel] RE : [RFC] Moving source code to "src"
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Christian JULLIEN <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Gus,
>
> This is a good idea. If you do so, I also suggest an arch directory that
> contains subdirectories for all supported archives
I wound up going with one dir per arch rather than an "arch"
directory. Let me know if there are any regressions.
-gus
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |