[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC segfault on Fedora 29
From: |
Michael Matz |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC segfault on Fedora 29 |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:47:50 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) |
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, Christian Jullien wrote:
> Ooops, not quite.
> I missed this line on log file (from Fedora 29).
> Btw, as suggested by ./configure, Fedora 29 requires --with-selinux
>
> ------------ dlltest ------------
> ../tcc -B.. -I../include -I.. -I.. -DCONFIG_LDDIR="\"lib64\""
> -DTCC_TARGET_X86_64 -DHAVE_SELINUX -DLIBTCC_AS_DLL ../libtcc.c -lm -ldl
> -shared -o libtcc2.so
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:132: dlltest] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Different bug? I don't have fedora 29 so can't debug this myself, what
does the gdb backtrace look like for the coredump (to make that easier,
build tcc with '-O0 -g', not the default -O2, i.e. change CFLAGS in
config.mak).
Ciao,
Michael.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:address@hidden
> On Behalf Of Michael Matz
> Sent: lundi 4 mars 2019 16:58
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC segfault on Fedora 29
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, Klaus Ebbe Grue wrote:
>
> > Is there news on the Fedora 29 segfault problem?
>
> No, as nobody provided the breaking crt*.o files ...
>
> > > some time. Alternatively: somebody can send me their /usr/lib64/crt*.o
> > > files from a system where the segfault reproduces. It's some unhandled
> >
> > I have included my /usr/lib64/crt*.o files, if that helps (I hope the
> > mailing list accepts attachments).
>
> ... until now. Fixed in mob.
>
>
> Ciao,
> Michael.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
>