[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size))
From: |
Ivo van Poorten |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)) |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jan 2020 19:30:33 +0100 |
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:19:10 +0100 ian <address@hidden> wrote:
> My main point is so far "why not implement then a * operator dedicated
> to vectors" ????
> Believe me, from what I did in languages programmation, overwiting
> such a standard operaor is ALWAYS a very bad idea......
I fully agree. Who am I? I just lurk on this mailinglist, but operator
overloading is something I hope stays out of C forever. If you have
ever had to wade through a multitude of header files to figure out what
an operator does on a certain object, I think you'll know what I mean.
So never add it to C. It's a slippery slope.
Regards,
Ivo
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), Michael Matz, 2020/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), ian, 2020/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), Michael Matz, 2020/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), ian, 2020/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), Michael Matz, 2020/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), ian, 2020/01/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), Rasmus Riiner, 2020/01/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), ian, 2020/01/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), uso ewin, 2020/01/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), ian, 2020/01/09
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)),
Ivo van Poorten <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), ian, 2020/01/09
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Request: __attribute__((vector_size)), Alexander Nicholi, 2020/01/27