[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.
From: |
Martin Blapp |
Subject: |
Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3 |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:33:33 +0100 (CET) |
Hi,
> > The problem I see now is the speed, as suspected. Qpopper does need
> > 10 seconds to send 1000 headers, while tpop3d needs 30 seconds. If
> > the webserver timeout is too low, we are running into a timeout.
>
> hmm. I'm surprised -- my example with 1,000 messages takes
> about 0.8s to run here (this is the code from CVS, reading
> from a maildir; in this application a mailspool should be
> a little faster).
>
> The test script in your message takes about 0.2s.
I mean my webmail application needs more time to read from
tpop3d than from qpopper. (Same number of messages)
I dunno why, but it happens.
Martin
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss] [PATCH] Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, (continued)
Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, Chris Lightfoot, 2005/02/02
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, Martin Blapp, 2005/02/02
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, Chris Lightfoot, 2005/02/02
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, Martin Blapp, 2005/02/02
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, Martin Blapp, 2005/02/02
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, Martin Blapp, 2005/02/02
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, Chris Lightfoot, 2005/02/02
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3,
Martin Blapp <=
- Re: [tpop3d-discuss]Corrupted TOP response with PIPELINING and tpop3d 1.5.3, Martin Blapp, 2005/02/03