Re: [tpop3d-discuss]stupid mailspool-index question

[Martin Blapp]

Hi,

> A customer uses a webmail application that interacts directly with the
> mbox spools, including adding and updating Status:/X-Status: header
> fields. Will this disrupt mailspool-index in a negative way?
>
> In general, has anyone experienced any issues/problems with
> mailspool-index? Seems like a great idea.

I suggest that you modify the mailspool-index to add such a field
to the mailspool index itself

or even better,

teach the webmail application to support UIDL and save the
states somewhere else (database, flat file etc).

Martin