Re: Updated gnumach-install.html

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

James Morrison <address@hidden> writes:

> I think the reference to CVS should be removed. GNU Mach CVS HEAD is
> broken in different ways from GNU Mach v1, so I think the tarball is
> the best thing to use.

How is the version in CVS broken?

What about this patch then?

--- gnumach-install.html.~1.7.~ 2002-09-06 20:07:38.000000000 +0200
+++ gnumach-install.html        2002-10-24 10:16:42.000000000 +0200
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@
 
 <H3><A HREF="#TOCversion" NAME="version">Latest version</A></H3>
 <P>
-The last stable version of GNU Mach is 1.2, but it is recommended that
-you use the version in CVS instead, as this fixes some bugs that
-prevent the kernel to work on some systems.
+The last stable version of GNU Mach is 1.3 (<A
+HREF="ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnumach/gnumach-1.3.tar.gz.sig";>GPG
+signature</A>).
 
 <H3><A HREF="#TOCinstall" NAME="install">Installation instructions</A></H3>
 <P>

-- 
Alfred M. Szmidt