[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why we won't have server side widgets anytime soon (Re: [xougen] Reg
Re: Why we won't have server side widgets anytime soon (Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets)
Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:44:39 -0700
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:31:23PM +0400, Yaroslav Rastrigin wrote:
>Why storing drawables in X server memory is Ok, but adding interactivity
> to them is not ?
The one can be implemented simply, the other will require an embedded
scripting language. Please read "The Unix Philosophy", by Mike Gancarz,
Sorry, but already existing interactive features _do_not_ require scripting
language at all.
That is right, that is exactly what I said. Current interactivity is
already implemented because it is simple. "Extending" the
interactivity to cover widgets WILL require embedded scripting language.
Some widgets change in shape, size, and color.
It's not true unless it makes you laugh,
but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.
Geek House Productions, Ltd.
Providing Unix & Internet Contracting and Consulting,
QA Testing, Technical Documentation, Systems Design & Implementation,
General Programming, E-commerce, Web & Mail Services since 1998
Address: 2459 E 41st Ave, Vancouver, BC V5R2W2
Description: PGP signature
Message not available
Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, Yaroslav Rastrigin, 2003/09/03
Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, weigelt, 2003/09/02
Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, Eric Anholt, 2003/09/02
Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, Craig Ringer, 2003/09/03
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, (continued)
- Message not available