Re: [Acl-devel] libattr 2.4.48 change in syscalls.c breaks fakechroot

[Filipe Brandenburger]

Hi Andreas,

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:51 AM Andreas Grünbacher <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am Do., 16. Aug. 2018 um 18:49 Uhr schrieb Andreas Grünbacher 
> <address@hidden>:
> > Am Do., 16. Aug. 2018 um 03:22 Uhr schrieb Filipe Brandenburger
> > <address@hidden>:
> > > Having said that, I really think it wouldn't hurt for libattr to
> > > continue providing these compatibility symbols having them implemented
> > > to do the syscalls themselves, using essentially the same code as
> > > pre-commit v2.4.48~17. There's really no downside to that, since the
> > > symbols are just there for compatibility anyways... That would prevent
> > > all these issues with LD_PRELOAD and it doesn't seem to me like that
> > > would be painful to maintain on libattr itself... Would you consider
> > > going back to using syscalls?
> >
> > Yes, I think that would be okay.
>
> Okay, I've pushed a fix. Could you guys please verify?

I just checked this against rpm test suite and I no longer have a
failure on the tests using fakechroot + install on SELinux which
triggered the libattr issue.

Thank you for fixing this!

Cheers,
Filipe

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature