[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: Stack traces
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: Stack traces |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:13:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> There is one thing that remains not satisfying: an m4 script that
Akim> issues warnings and then an m4_fatal will not see the warnings, since
Akim> they are processed after a _successful_ run of m4.
>> Why can't they be processed after a failed run? Is that just
>> because the xsystem() is not the right interface for the job,
>> or is it something else?
Akim> Maybe I misunderstood your suggestion
Reading your comments about m4_exit/m4_fatal I think the problem
is that I simply have not clue what the problem really is :)
I thought your algorithm was
xsystem("m4 [...lots of args...] > tmpfile");
process_traces_from("tmpfile");
hence the comment about xsystem(), which abort on error
even though process_traces_from could have displayed a few
warning before eventually conking out.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- FYI: Stack traces, Akim Demaille, 2003/08/22
- Message not available
- Message not available