[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: portability of positional parameters after $9?
|
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
|
Subject: |
Re: portability of positional parameters after $9? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:33:19 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:36:22PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> It's not a myth. The 7th edition shell behaved that way; it reported
> an error if given "${10}". Solaris 10 /bin/sh still acts that way:
attached please find an attempt to document this.
OK to commit?
Stepan
autoconf-20051020-param.patch
Description: Text document
- Re: portability of positional parameters after $9?,
Stepan Kasal <=